Pennsylvania medical marijuana bill sponsored by half of Senate

Dana Ulrich and daughter, Lorelei

State Sens. Mike Folmer (R) and Daylin Leach (D) took the lead for a second year in Pennsylvania’s medical marijuana debate. This year, however, they enjoy the company of 23 senators in sponsoring a bill.

Folmer and Leach held a press conference Tuesday announcing the Medical Cannabis Act (S.B. 3). The state Senate passed a medical marijuana bill last year, but it expired without a hearing in the House. The new bill creates a regulated medical marijuana system in Pennsylvania using the same language approved by a 43-7 floor vote last September.

With a new, receptive governor in office and support in the House, Pennsylvania appears ready for marijuana policy reform.

“There was a whole different feel being at the Capitol,” said Dana Ulrich by phone Wednesday. “It was heartwarming to see other senators standing up there.”

Dana Ulrich and daughter, Lorelei
[Photo courtesy: Campaign for Compassion]
Ulrich (pictured left with daughter, Lorelei) co-founded Campaign for Compassion, a Pennsylvania grassroots organization of parents who want to treat their children with medical cannabis. She gained support through her website — Legalize for Lorelei — where she advocates for her 7-year-old daughter who suffers from severe seizures.

Folmer joined the call for medical marijuana laws last year after meeting with Ulrich and others like her.

Executive support

Gov. Tom Wolf held a reception in his office after the press conference with the families in attendance. Ulrich didn’t expect the invitation.

“We didn’t even have to ask,” she says, “he invited us to come up and see him.”

Wolf vowed to support the issue during his campaign to replace former governor Tom Corbett and now he’s following up on his promise. Corbett opposed medical marijuana and, according to Ulrich, avoided meeting with advocates. Supporters welcome the change.

“[Gov. Wolf] was enthusiastic about our cause,” Leach said in a statement, “and told us to send him a medical cannabis bill as fast as possible.”

While support for Pennsylvania medical marijuana is high, advocates worry about restrictions in the bill. Among the concerns are a ban on smoking or vaporizing cannabis and a reduction in qualifying conditions.

“The bill that initially went to Senate Appropriations had 45 qualifying conditions,” says Patrick Nightingale, executive director of Pittsburgh NORML. The version that passed the Senate lists nine conditions after the rest were removed from last year’s bill in committee.

Pennsylvania marijuana activists, including Philly NORML, the state chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, criticize the bill as not doing enough. Some even blame the parents for the bill’s limitations, an assertion that Ulrich says is misplaced.

Ulrich says she and other parents have always supported a “fully comprehensive medical cannabis bill in Pennsylvania.” She was likewise disappointed with the watered-down bill.

Folmer assured Nightingale and Ulrich that their concerns would be addressed in committee through the amendment process. The bill has been referred to the State Government Committee that Folmer chairs. Other sponsors, including Leach, sit on the committee as well.

Published by P. Aiden Hunt

Aiden Hunt is a creative writer and freelance journalist covering marijuana policy and other related issues. He has been published in print and online by outlets such as The Denver Post (The Cannabist), Marijuana.com, The Hemp Connoisseur Magazine and Cronic Magazine. He is currently focused on literary creative nonfiction.

4 thoughts on “Pennsylvania medical marijuana bill sponsored by half of Senate

  1. I would like to see Pennsylvania, the “keystone” state, take the lead on the east coast for restoring hemp cannabis to its 1650-1850 status of fully free, and unregulated; except to ask farmers to grow even more of it. For your health, economy, and state of mind!

    Like

    1. While marijuana is a state issue, I think industrial hemp is going to be restored through federal action. I know there are plenty of advocates in Pennsylvania fighting for hemp, though, especially in the more rural parts of the state.

      Like

      1. That would be welcome. The “fed” really needs to be stuffed back into its cage on this and a host of other topics too. Without the benefits of the federal usurpations, the hemp prohibitionists might not enjoy as much “clout” on a state level.

        Like

  2. I was pleasantly surprised to find support for medical marijuana and hemp among the Pennsylvania Amish who come to the Trenton Farmer’s Market a couple times a week. One of them noticed my CMMNJ pin and started talking about it.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: